Whalen v. Warden of San Quentin

Filing 16

ORDER REGARDING Confidential Case Evaluation Form signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/30/2015. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL LEE WHALEN, 12 13 14 15 16 Case No. 1:14-cv-01865-LJO-SAB Petitioner, DEATH PENALTY CASE v. ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL CASE EVALUATION FORM WARDEN, California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent. 17 18 19 20 By order dated February 12, 2015, the Court (1) directed the parties to complete and 21 file under seal the Confidential Case Evaluation Form attached to that order, and (2) set an 22 initial telephonic Case Management Conference for May 11, 2015, at 10:30 a.m., before the 23 undersigned. (ECF No. 12.) 24 The Confidential Case Evaluation Form provided to the parties with the February 12, 25 2015 order inadvertently omitted several pages. 26 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 28 1 1. 1 Counsel for both parties are directed to complete and file the Confidential Case 2 Evaluation Form attached as Appendix B to the Fresno Attorney Guide to Case 3 Management and Budgeting in Capital Habeas Cases, (hereinafter the “Attorney 4 Guide”), which is posted on the Court’s web-page. See Attorney Guide, ¶ 44. 5 This document shall be submitted to the Court confidentially, filed under seal by 6 e-mailing to the Court’s Approved Sealed@ e-mail address, 7 ApprovedSealed@caed.uscourts.gov, by not later than Friday, May 8, 2015. 2. 8 The February 12, 2015 order shall otherwise continue in full force and effect. The initial telephonic Case Management Conference will take place on May 11, 9 2015, at 10:30 a.m., as previously scheduled. 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: April 30, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?