Whalen v. Warden of San Quentin
Filing
16
ORDER REGARDING Confidential Case Evaluation Form signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/30/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL LEE WHALEN,
12
13
14
15
16
Case No. 1:14-cv-01865-LJO-SAB
Petitioner,
DEATH PENALTY CASE
v.
ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL
CASE EVALUATION FORM
WARDEN, California State Prison at San
Quentin,
Respondent.
17
18
19
20
By order dated February 12, 2015, the Court (1) directed the parties to complete and
21 file under seal the Confidential Case Evaluation Form attached to that order, and (2) set an
22 initial telephonic Case Management Conference for May 11, 2015, at 10:30 a.m., before the
23 undersigned. (ECF No. 12.)
24
The Confidential Case Evaluation Form provided to the parties with the February 12,
25 2015 order inadvertently omitted several pages.
26
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
28
1
1.
1
Counsel for both parties are directed to complete and file the Confidential Case
2
Evaluation Form attached as Appendix B to the Fresno Attorney Guide to Case
3
Management and Budgeting in Capital Habeas Cases, (hereinafter the “Attorney
4
Guide”), which is posted on the Court’s web-page. See Attorney Guide, ¶ 44.
5
This document shall be submitted to the Court confidentially, filed under seal by
6
e-mailing to the Court’s Approved Sealed@ e-mail address,
7
ApprovedSealed@caed.uscourts.gov, by not later than Friday, May 8, 2015.
2.
8
The February 12, 2015 order shall otherwise continue in full force and effect.
The initial telephonic Case Management Conference will take place on May 11,
9
2015, at 10:30 a.m., as previously scheduled.
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14 Dated:
April 30, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?