Whalen v. Warden of San Quentin
Filing
26
ORDER following case management conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/27/2015. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL LEE WHALEN,
12
13
14
15
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 1:14-cv-01865-LJO-SAB
DEATH PENALTY CASE
ORDER FOLLOWING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
WARDEN, California State Prison at San
Quentin,
Respondent.
16
17
18
This matter came on for a case management conference on May 26, 2015, at 3:00 p.m.,
19 in Department 9 of the above referenced court, the Honorable Stanley A. Boone presiding.
20 Petitioner, Daniel Whalen, was represented by Brian Abbington, Esq., and Jennifer Mann,
21 Esq., of the Federal Public Defender’s Office. Respondent, Warden of San Quentin State
22 Prison, was represented by Catherine Nieto, Esq. of the California Attorney General’s Office.
23 All counsel appeared telephonically.
24
Based on the parties’ confidential case evaluations and discussions at the May 26
25 conference the Court finds as follows:
26
1.
By capital case standards this case is not especially complex.
27
2.
Limited discovery and factual development took place during state level post-
28
conviction investigation; no evidentiary hearing was held at the state level.
1
1
3.
have not assembled the balance of an estimated 32,035 page record.
2
3
Petitioner’s counsel have obtained state habeas and appellate counsel files, but
4.
Respondent will lodge the state record, in electronic (PDF-OCR) form, with the
4
Court on or before July 15, 2015, accompanied by a notice of lodging to be filed
5
the same day. Should Petitioner’s counsel identify any documents in the notice
6
of lodging to which they do not have access, they will contact the Respondent’s
7
counsel.
8
Petitioner’s counsel upon request.
9
5.
The parties agree to completing record assembly and review and preliminary
investigation by no later than September 15, 2015.
10
11
Respondent’s counsel shall make all such documents available to
6.
The statute of limitations, under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), will be deemed to expire
12
on November 12, 2015 unless Respondent files an objection to this date by no
13
later than thirty days following the filed date of this order, in which event the
14
Court will resolve any dispute.
15
7.
Petitioner’s counsel shall investigate and develop a complete federal petition,
16
including any newly discovered, unexhausted claims, before the limitations
17
period expires and shall file Petitioner’s federal petition on or before November
18
12, 2015.
19
unexhausted claims to the California Supreme Court also should be filed on or
20
before November 12, 2015. Counsel for Petitioner shall include with the federal
21
petition any request for stay and abeyance under Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269
22
(2005). Counsel for Petitioner does not at this point indicate that a request for
23
equitable tolling will be needed.
24
8.
27
Respondent shall file any opposition to stay and abeyance and/or motion to
dismiss, or answer to the federal petition, on or before January 15, 2016.
25
26
Any second state petition on Petitioner’s behalf presenting
9.
A further case management conference is set for January 29, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.
Counsel shall appear telephonically and are directed to contact the Court’s
28
2
1
Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Ms. Mamie Hernandez, to obtain the teleconference
2
code.
10.
3
The parties are advised that the Court and will view any request to extend the
4
above timeline with disfavor absent reasonably unforeseeable and unavoidable
5
circumstances showing good cause for an extension of time.
Counsel for both parties are directed to familiarize themselves with the Guide to Case
6
7 Management and Budgeting in Capital Habeas Cases, Eastern District of California, Fresno
8 Division
(the
“Fresno
Attorney
Guide”)
(available
on
the
Court’s
website
at
9 www.caed.uscourts.gov under “Forms”).
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13 Dated:
May 27, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?