Trevino v. City of Bakersfield et al

Filing 78

AMENDED ORDER AFTER HEARING, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/19/2016. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JESSE TREVINO,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al.,

15

Defendants.

) Case No.: 1:14-cv-001873 - JLT
)
) AMENDED ORDER AFTER HEARING
)
)
)
)
)
)

16
17

On July 18, 2016, the Court held the hearing on the motions in limine. At the hearing, the

18

plaintiff notified the Court he wished for the Court to continue the trial. In addition, the issue of the

19

propriety of using a jury questionnaire was raised. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

20
21
22

1.

No later than July 19, 2016, the plaintiff may file his motion to continue the trial. No

later than July 21, 2016, the defendants may file opposition to the motion. No reply is permitted;
2.

No later than July 21, 2016, counsel may file a joint statement proposing the use of a

23

jury questionnaire or opposing the use of a jury questionnaire. In the event that either side wishes to

24

use a jury questionnaire, the proposed questionnaire(s) SHALL be attached to the joint statement. If

25

neither side wishes to use a jury questionnaire, no filing is required.

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 19, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE