Hall v. Robicheaux-Smith et al
ORDER Relating Cases and Reassigning Action to United States Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin; New case number is: 1:14-cv-01890 LJO-GSA (PC), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 03/17/2015. (Martin-Gill, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARLENE ROBICHEAUX-SMITH, et al.,
Case No. 1:14-cv-01890-LJO-SKO (PC)
New Case No. 1:14-cv-01890-LJO-GSA (PC)
ORDER RELATING CASES AND
REASSIGNING ACTION TO UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY S.
Plaintiff Matthew Hall, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil action in Kings
17 County Superior Court on July 10, 2014, and it was removed by Defendants Robicheaux-Smith,
18 Graves, and Clark on November 25, 2014. 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Plaintiff seeks relief, in relevant
19 part, for the violation of his rights under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution at
20 California State Prison-Corcoran. 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
A number of virtually identical actions have been removed to this Court. 28 U.S.C. §
22 1441. The Court’s review of these cases reveals that the instant action is related under Local Rule
23 123 to the action entitled Sands v. Smith, 1:14-cv-01780-LJO-GSA (PC). Both actions are based
24 on the same or substantially similar underlying facts and involve overlapping questions of law and
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
The Office of the Clerk shall relate this case with case 1:14-cv-01780-LJO-GSA
This case shall be reassigned to the docket of United States Magistrate Judge Gary
The new case number shall be:
and all future pleadings and/or correspondence must be so numbered; use of an
incorrect case number or incorrect judge’s initials may result in delay in processing
documents and distribution of copies to the judge assigned.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 17, 2015
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?