Hall v. Robicheaux-Smith et al

Filing 5

ORDER Granting Request for Relief from Responding to Complaint Pending Screening and for Thirty-Day Extension of Time, to Commence Upon Issuance of Screening Order re 2 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/2/14. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MATTHEW HALL, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 v. MARLENE ROBICHEAUX-SMITH, et al., Case No. 1:14-cv-01890-SKO (PC) ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM RESPONDING TO COMPLAINT PENDING SCREENING AND FOR THIRTY-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME, TO COMMENCE UPON ISSUANCE OF SCREENING ORDER Defendants. 14 (Doc. 2) 15 _____________________________________/ 16 17 Plaintiff Matthew Hall, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil action in Kings 18 County Superior Court on July 10, 2014. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 19 state law for the violation of his rights; and Defendants Robicheaux-Smith, Graves, and Clark 20 filed a notice of removal on November 25, 2014. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). 21 Defendants’ request to be relieved of their obligation to respond to the complaint pending 22 screening by the Court, and for a thirty-day extension of time to respond to the complaint, to 23 commence upon issuance of the screening order, is HEREBY GRANTED. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 24 Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 2, 2014 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?