T.C.E.F., Inc. et al v. County of Kern et al
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/14/15 ORDERING this action DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
10
T.C.E.F., INC., a California
corporation, dba ALL GREEN
COLLECTIVE; TONY F. MONASSAR;
JABE T. SATTERFIELD;
Plaintiffs,
11
14
15
16
17
DISMISSAL ORDER
v.
12
13
No. 1:14-cv-01893-GEB-BAM
COUNTY OF KERN, a political
subdivision of the State of
California; and GREG FENTON
Kern County Building
Official, on behalf of
themselves and in the name of
the People of the State of
California; and DOES 1
through 10, Inclusive;
Defendants.
18
19
20
Plaintiffs were required to respond to an Order filed
21
February 13, 2015, by either filing proof that each defendant was
22
served with process or “a sufficient explanation why service was
23
not completed within [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m)’s]
24
prescribed service period.” (Order 2:10-17, ECF No. 11.) This
25
filing was due no later than April 3, 2015. (Id.) The February
26
13,
27
required showing by this deadline may result in “the unserved
28
defendant(s) and/or this action being dismissed.” (Id.)
2015
Order
warned
Plaintiffs
1
that
failure
to
make
the
1
Plaintiffs failed to respond to the February 13, 2015
2
Order by this deadline, and review of the docket reflects that no
3
proof
4
Therefore, this action is dismissed, and it shall be closed.
5
6
of
service
has
been
filed
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 14, 2015
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
for
either
named
defendant.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?