T.C.E.F., Inc. et al v. County of Kern et al

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/14/15 ORDERING this action DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 T.C.E.F., INC., a California corporation, dba ALL GREEN COLLECTIVE; TONY F. MONASSAR; JABE T. SATTERFIELD; Plaintiffs, 11 14 15 16 17 DISMISSAL ORDER v. 12 13 No. 1:14-cv-01893-GEB-BAM COUNTY OF KERN, a political subdivision of the State of California; and GREG FENTON Kern County Building Official, on behalf of themselves and in the name of the People of the State of California; and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive; Defendants. 18 19 20 Plaintiffs were required to respond to an Order filed 21 February 13, 2015, by either filing proof that each defendant was 22 served with process or “a sufficient explanation why service was 23 not completed within [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m)’s] 24 prescribed service period.” (Order 2:10-17, ECF No. 11.) This 25 filing was due no later than April 3, 2015. (Id.) The February 26 13, 27 required showing by this deadline may result in “the unserved 28 defendant(s) and/or this action being dismissed.” (Id.) 2015 Order warned Plaintiffs 1 that failure to make the 1 Plaintiffs failed to respond to the February 13, 2015 2 Order by this deadline, and review of the docket reflects that no 3 proof 4 Therefore, this action is dismissed, and it shall be closed. 5 6 of service has been filed IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 14, 2015 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 for either named defendant.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?