Van Buren v. Waddle et al
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM to Transport Plaintiff Irvin Van Buren, CDCR# H-83954, for Settlement Conference on August 7, 2017 at 9:30 a.m., signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 07/07/2017. (Flores, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IRVIN VAN BUREN,
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01894-DAD-MJS (PC)
C. WADDLE, et al.,
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
Irvin Van Buren, CDCR # H-83954, a necessary and material witness in a settlement conference
in this case on August 7, 2017, is confined in California Correctional Institution (CCI), in the
custody of the Warden. In order to secure this inmate's attendance it is necessary that a Writ of
Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate before
Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe at the U. S. District Court, Courtroom #8, 2500 Tulare
Street, Fresno, California 93721, on Monday, August 7, 2017 at 9:30 a.m.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,
commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to participate in a
settlement conference at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement
conference or as ordered by the court.
2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is
ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
To: Warden, CCI, P.O. Box 1031, Tehachapi, California 93581:
WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before Judge McAuliffe at
the time and place above, until completion of the settlement conference or as ordered by the
FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the inmate
and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 7, 2017
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?