Thompson v. Vidurria et al

Filing 18

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 06/16/2015. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TYRONE THOMPSON, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. VIDURRIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:14-cv-01896-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT [ECF No. 17] Plaintiff Tyrone Thompson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s claim of deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Vidaurri and Martinez. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for entry of default, filed June 15, 2015. (ECF No. 17.) 23 The Court ordered service by the United States marshal on March 11, 2015, and both 24 Defendants waived service on March 20, 2015, and a responsive pleading was due on or before May 25 19, 2015. (ECF No. 11.) 26 On May 19, 2015, Defendants filed a motion for an extension of time to respond to the 27 complaint. (ECF No. 12.) The Court granted Defendants’ request and the time to file a responsive 28 pleading was extended to June 2, 2015. (ECF No. 13.) 1 On June 2, 2015, Defendant Martinez filed a motion to dismiss, and Defendant Vidaurri filed 1 2 an answer to the complaint. (ECF Nos. 14, 15.) Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires the Clerk of the Court to enter 3 4 default “when a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or 5 otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Because Defendants filed a timely response to the complaint, Plaintiff’s request for entry of 6 7 default must be DENIED. 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 16, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?