Feiger v. Smith et al

Filing 33

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 31 Motion for Continuance of Settlement Conference as Moot signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 08/31/2016. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT FEIGER, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. 1:14-cv-01920-DAD-EPG-PC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AS MOOT MARLENE SMITH, et al., 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 31.) Settlement Conference September 29, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Courtroom #8 Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff Robert Feiger is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with 21 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A settlement conference is scheduled for 22 this action on September 29, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. 23 McAuliffe. 24 On August 15, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel and a motion to 25 continue the settlement conference until after the Court has ruled on the motion for 26 appointment of counsel. (ECF Nos. 30, 31.) Plaintiff’s motion to continue the settlement 27 conference is now moot, because on August 24, 2016, the Court ruled on the motion for 28 appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 32.) Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion to continue the 1 1 settlement conference shall be denied, and the settlement conference remains scheduled for 2 September 29, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. 5 6 Plaintiff’s motion for a continuance of the settlement conference for this action, filed on August 15, 2016, is DENIED as moot; and 2. 7 The settlement conference remains scheduled for September 29, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 31, 2016 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?