Feiger v. Smith et al
Filing
33
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 31 Motion for Continuance of Settlement Conference as Moot signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 08/31/2016. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT FEIGER,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
1:14-cv-01920-DAD-EPG-PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AS
MOOT
MARLENE SMITH, et al.,
15
Defendants.
(ECF No. 31.)
Settlement Conference
September 29, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.
Courtroom #8
Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff Robert Feiger is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with
21
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A settlement conference is scheduled for
22
this action on September 29, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Barbara A.
23
McAuliffe.
24
On August 15, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel and a motion to
25
continue the settlement conference until after the Court has ruled on the motion for
26
appointment of counsel. (ECF Nos. 30, 31.) Plaintiff’s motion to continue the settlement
27
conference is now moot, because on August 24, 2016, the Court ruled on the motion for
28
appointment of counsel.
(ECF No. 32.)
Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion to continue the
1
1
settlement conference shall be denied, and the settlement conference remains scheduled for
2
September 29, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1.
5
6
Plaintiff’s motion for a continuance of the settlement conference for this action,
filed on August 15, 2016, is DENIED as moot; and
2.
7
The settlement conference remains scheduled for September 29, 2016 at 9:00
a.m. before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 31, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?