Feiger v. Smith et al
Filing
42
ORDER granting 41 Motion for Extension of Time to serve initial disclosures and to reschedule the initial scheduling conference signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/15/2016. (Initial Scheduling Conference reset for 3/6/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean). (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT FEIGER,
12
13
v.
14
15
Case No. 1:14-cv-01920-DAD-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO SERVE INITIAL DISCLOSURES
AND TO RESCHEDULE THE INITIAL
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
MARLENE SMITH, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
On December 14, 2016, Defendants filed a request for a 30-day extension of time to
19
provide Plaintiff with their initial disclosures, and a request to reschedule the Initial Scheduling
20
Conference 30 days from its current date. (ECF No. 41). Defendants ask for the extension and
21
the rescheduling because Defendants are obtaining outside counsel, and outside counsel has not
22
yet had an opportunity to file a substitution of attorney in this case.
23
The Court, having considered Defendants’ request for an extension of time to serve initial
24
disclosures and to reschedule the Initial Scheduling Conference, and good cause having been
25
found:
26
27
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff and Defendants are GRANTED an extension of time of 30
days, through and including January 17, 2017, to exchange initial disclosures.
28
1
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ request to reschedule the Initial Scheduling
2
Conference for thirty-days after the January 30, 2017, date that was originally set, is GRANTED.
3
The Initial Scheduling Conference is rescheduled to March 6, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 15, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?