Feiger v. Smith et al

Filing 66

ORDER After Initial Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/10/17. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9
10
11
12

1:14-cv-01920-DAD-EPG (PC)

ROBERT FEIGER,
Plaintiff,

ORDER AFTER INITIAL SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
(ECF NOS. 40 & 64)

v.
MARLENE SMITH, et al.,
Defendants.

13
14
15

Robert Feiger (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action

16

filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which includes state law claims. On March 6, 2017, the

17

Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference (“Conference”) in Feiger v. Smith (1:14-cv-01920)

18

and Hauseur v. Clark (1:14-cv-01987). Mark Hauseur telephonically appeared on his own

19

behalf. Robert Feiger telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Counsel Jonathan Paul

20

telephonically appeared on behalf of defendant Smith, counsel Thomas Feher appeared

21

telephonically on behalf of defendant Clark, and counsel Kathleen Williams appeared

22

telephonically on behalf of defendant Graves. Counsel Justin Walker and Tracy Hendrickson,

23

both of whom are with the Office of the Attorney General, specially appeared.

24

For the reasons stated on the record at the Conference, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

25

1. Plaintiff’s requests to receive mail from other plaintiffs confidentially and

26

legal files from his family confidentially (ECF No. 40) is treated as

27

WITHDRAWN;

28

2. The Office of the Attorney General is to promptly send all of the documents
1

1

it has received that are related to this case to Kathleen Williams. Defense

2

counsel are to meet and confer, and compile one set of documents from the

3

documents that they have each received that are related to this case. If any

4

documents are withheld as privileged, a privilege log must be included.

5

Within forty-five days of the date of service of this order, Kathleen Williams

6

is to bates stamp that set of documents, and send a bates stamped copy of

7

that set of documents to Plaintiff and each other defense counsel;

8

3. Within fourteen days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiff is to

9

provide all relevant documents he has related to his case only to Jonathon

10

Paul. In a separate order, Mark Hauseur will be ordered to provide all

11

relevant documents he has related to his case and Plaintiff’s case to Jonathon

12

Paul. Within forty-five days of the date of service of this order Jonathon

13

Paul is to compile those documents, bates stamp them, and send a bates

14

stamped copy of that set of documents to Plaintiff and each other defense

15

counsel;

16

4. All documents that Plaintiff and Mark Hauseur send to Jonathon Paul are to

17

be compiled, with a complete copy going to both Plaintiff and Mark

18

Hauseur, unless Plaintiff or Mark Hauseur specifically mark particular

19

documents that should not be sent to the other;

20

5. Plaintiff is to give authorization for defense counsel to request his medical

21

records from 2006 onward.

22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

March 10, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28
2