Feiger v. Smith et al
Filing
66
ORDER After Initial Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/10/17. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
10
11
12
1:14-cv-01920-DAD-EPG (PC)
ROBERT FEIGER,
Plaintiff,
ORDER AFTER INITIAL SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
(ECF NOS. 40 & 64)
v.
MARLENE SMITH, et al.,
Defendants.
13
14
15
Robert Feiger (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
16
filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which includes state law claims. On March 6, 2017, the
17
Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference (“Conference”) in Feiger v. Smith (1:14-cv-01920)
18
and Hauseur v. Clark (1:14-cv-01987). Mark Hauseur telephonically appeared on his own
19
behalf. Robert Feiger telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Counsel Jonathan Paul
20
telephonically appeared on behalf of defendant Smith, counsel Thomas Feher appeared
21
telephonically on behalf of defendant Clark, and counsel Kathleen Williams appeared
22
telephonically on behalf of defendant Graves. Counsel Justin Walker and Tracy Hendrickson,
23
both of whom are with the Office of the Attorney General, specially appeared.
24
For the reasons stated on the record at the Conference, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
25
1. Plaintiff’s requests to receive mail from other plaintiffs confidentially and
26
legal files from his family confidentially (ECF No. 40) is treated as
27
WITHDRAWN;
28
2. The Office of the Attorney General is to promptly send all of the documents
1
1
it has received that are related to this case to Kathleen Williams. Defense
2
counsel are to meet and confer, and compile one set of documents from the
3
documents that they have each received that are related to this case. If any
4
documents are withheld as privileged, a privilege log must be included.
5
Within forty-five days of the date of service of this order, Kathleen Williams
6
is to bates stamp that set of documents, and send a bates stamped copy of
7
that set of documents to Plaintiff and each other defense counsel;
8
3. Within fourteen days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiff is to
9
provide all relevant documents he has related to his case only to Jonathon
10
Paul. In a separate order, Mark Hauseur will be ordered to provide all
11
relevant documents he has related to his case and Plaintiff’s case to Jonathon
12
Paul. Within forty-five days of the date of service of this order Jonathon
13
Paul is to compile those documents, bates stamp them, and send a bates
14
stamped copy of that set of documents to Plaintiff and each other defense
15
counsel;
16
4. All documents that Plaintiff and Mark Hauseur send to Jonathon Paul are to
17
be compiled, with a complete copy going to both Plaintiff and Mark
18
Hauseur, unless Plaintiff or Mark Hauseur specifically mark particular
19
documents that should not be sent to the other;
20
5. Plaintiff is to give authorization for defense counsel to request his medical
21
records from 2006 onward.
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 10, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?