Feiger v. Smith et al
Filing
92
ORDER on Stipulation to Amend Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/14/2017. Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff: 11/10/2017. Expert Discovery Cutoff: 1/31/2018. Expert Disclosures: 12/12/2017. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures: 1/11/2018. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: 4/11/2018. Status Conference RESET for 10/19/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone: (408) 298-2000
Facsimile: (408) 298-6046
Email: service@mission.legal
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Robert Feiger
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT FEIGER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
MARLENE SMITH, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:14-cv-01920-DAD-EPG
STIPULATION TO AMEND
SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER
17
Plaintiff, Robert Feiger (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, Natalie Clark, Marlene
18
Robicheaux-Smith, and Antoneya Graves (“Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff, “the
19
Parties”), together request that the Court amend the Scheduling Order as follows:
20
21
WHEREAS, attorney Tanya Moore of the Mission Law Firm, A.P.C., was appointed
pro bono counsel for Plaintiff on April 4, 2017 (Dkt. 73);
22
23
WHEREAS, a telephonic Discovery Status Conference is set for August 7, 2017 in this
matter;
24
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel has required time to review the voluminous documents
25
in the case, and meeting and communicating with Plaintiff has taken Plaintiff’s counsel
26
significant time due to Plaintiff’s incarceration, such that Plaintiff will be unable to conduct the
27
necessary discovery in time to comply with the current deadlines set by this Court’s
28
Scheduling Order, dated March 9, 2017 (Dkt. 65);
STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER
1
1
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE
2
COUNSEL, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE to amend the Scheduling Order as
3
follows:
4
Event
Current Date
New Date
5
Non-expert discovery cutoff
September 29, 2017
November 10, 2017
6
Expert discovery cutoff
December 20, 2017
January 31, 2018
Expert disclosures
October 31, 2017
December 12, 2017
Rebuttal expert disclosures
November 30, 2017
January 11, 2018
Dispositive motion filing
deadline
February 28, 2018
April 11, 2018
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
The Parties additionally stipulate to continue the Discovery Status Conference set for
August 7, 2017, to a date on or around October 16, 2017 at the Court’s convenience.
All other requirements set forth in the Scheduling Order relating to the above shall
remain unchanged, including the pre-trial and trial dates.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: July 13, 2017
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Robert Feiger
18
19
20
21
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
Dated: July 13, 2017
22
LeBEAU – THELEN, LLP
/s/ Thomas P. Feher
Thomas P. Feher
Attorneys for Defendant,
Natalie Clark
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: July 13, 2017
RIVERA & ASSOCIATES
/s/ Jonathan B. Paul
Jonathan B. Paul
Attorneys for Defendant,
Marlene Robicheaux-Smith
STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER
2
1
2
Dated: July 13, 2017
WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES
3
/s/ Martha M. Stringer
Martha M. Stringer
Attorneys for Defendant,
Antoneya Graves
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
ORDER
The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Order, dated March 9, 2017 (ECF
No. 65), is amended as follows:
Event
Current Date
New Date
Non-expert discovery cutoff
September 29, 2017
November 10, 2017
Expert discovery cutoff
December 20, 2017
January 31, 2018
14
Expert disclosures
October 31, 2017
December 12, 2017
15
Rebuttal expert disclosures
November 30, 2017
January 11, 2018
16
Dispositive motion filing
deadline
February 28, 2018
April 11, 2018
12
13
17
18
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Telephonic Discovery Status Conference
19
currently set for August 7, 2017, is continued to October 19, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom
20
10 before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The Parties have leave to appear by phone. To
21
join the conference, each party is directed to call the toll-free number (888) 251−2909 and use
22
Access Code 1024453. Up until two weeks before the discovery conference, the parties may
23
file a motion to compel further discovery responses. One week before the discovery
24
conference, the responding party may file a response to the motion to compel. The motion
25
should include a copy of the request(s) and any response to the request(s) at issue. Unless there
26
is a need for discovery prior to the discovery conference, motions to compel will not be
27
considered until the discovery conference. Motions to compel will not be permitted after the
28
discovery conference absent good cause. The parties should be prepared to address all
STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER
3
1
discovery disputes at the discovery conference.
2
3
All other requirements set forth in the Scheduling Order relating to the above shall
remain unchanged, including the pre-trial and trial dates.
4
These revised dates should be considered as firm. No further extensions of these
5
deadlines will be granted absent a showing of good cause and a scheduling conference with the
6
Court.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated:
July 14, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?