Doop v. Woodford, et al.

Filing 17

ORDER To SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed For Failure To Follow A Court Order And Failure To Prosecute, Twenty-One Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/6/2015. Show Cause Response due by 7/29/2015.(Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 CHRIS DOOP, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. WOODFORD, et al., 15 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:14cv01933 DLB PC ORDERTO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FOLLOW A COURT ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff Chris Doop (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 17 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff commenced this action by writing a letter to 19 the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on October 10, 2014. He 20 21 filed his complaint on October 24, 2014. On January 5, 2015, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) as a matter of right.1 22 On May 14, 2015, the Court screened Plaintiff’s FAC and dismissed it with leave to 23 amend. Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days. Over thirty 24 25 26 (30) days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court. 27 28 1 Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge on December 12, 2014. 1 1 2 3 4 Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed for failure to follow a Court order and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff SHALL file a response to this order within twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of this order. Plaintiff may also comply with this order by filing an amended complaint. 5 Failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: /s/ Dennis July 6, 2015 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?