Young v. Biter et al
Filing
34
ORDER DISCHARGING 32 Order to Show Cause Why this Action should not be Dismissed for Failure to State a Claim, Failure to Obey a Court Order and Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/15/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HOWARD ALLEN YOUNG,
12
Case No. 1:14-cv-01942-BAM (PC)
Plaintiff,
Defendants.
13
(ECF No. 32)
v.
14
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT
BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
CLAIM, FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT
ORDER, AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
M. D. Biter, et al.,
15
16
17
Plaintiff Howard Allen Young (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
18
19
forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on
20
December 5, 2014. (ECF No. 1.)
On December 9, 2016, the Court issued an order dismissing Plaintiff’s second amended
21
22
complaint with leave to amend within thirty (30) days. (ECF No. 31.) Plaintiff failed to file an
23
amended complaint. Therefore, on January 20, 2017, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to
24
show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim, failure to obey a
25
court order, and failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 32.) The Court informed Plaintiff that he could
26
comply with the order to show cause by filing a third amended complaint. (Id. at 2.) On February
27
13, 2017, Plaintiff filed a third amended complaint. (ECF No. 33.)
28
///
1
1
Based on Plaintiff’s filing his third amended complaint, the Court finds good cause to
2
discharge the January 20, 2017 order. Accordingly, the Court’s January 20, 2017 order to show
3
cause is HEREBY DISCHARGED. The Court advises Plaintiff that his third amended complaint
4
will be screened in due course.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
February 15, 2017
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?