Matthews v. Holland
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Request to Schedule a Settlement Conference without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/16/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IVAN LEE MATTHEWS,
HOLLAND, et al.,
Case No. 1:14-cv-01959-DAD-SKO (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO
SCHEDULE A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
(Docs. 38, 39)
Plaintiff, Ivan Lee Matthews, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint has been served
on Defendants who filed their answer. On April 26, 2017, the Discovery and Scheduling Order
issued, providing a deadline for the filing of dispositive motions on or before March 5, 2018.
(Doc. 28.) On June 7, 2017, Plaintiff filed two documents requesting that a settlement conference
be scheduled and setting forth his proposed settlement terms. (Docs. 38, 39.)
The Court will not expend its limited resources on a settlement conference at this juncture
in the case unless both sides believe it would be beneficial. At this stage, the defendants are
researching the relevant issues and assessing the merit of the claims against them as well as any
affirmative defenses. Generally, the Court will solicit the parties’ positions and set a settlement
conference following a ruling on dispositive motions, if appropriate.
In the meantime, the parties are encouraged to meet and confer regarding a possible
resolution of the case. Plaintiff may serve Defendants with an offer of settlement at any time. If
both sides believe a settlement conference would be beneficial before a ruling on dispositive
motions, they are encouraged to inform the Court so that the Court can accommodate their
Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for a
settlement conference is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 16, 2017
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?