Matthews v. Holland

Filing 82

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/27/2019 DENYING without prejudice to renewal if the District Judge declines to stay these proceedings or when any stay of the proceeding is lifted, 68 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IVAN LEE MATTHEWS, 12 No. 1:14-cv-1959 KJM DB P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 KIM HOLLAND, 15 ORDER Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 17 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendant’s use of the Guard One security 19 system when he was incarcerated at the California Correctional Institution caused him severe 20 sleep deprivation. On January 18, 2019, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF 21 No. 68.) On March 5, 2019, Judge Mueller issued an order granting in part and denying in part a 22 motion to dismiss in a related case, Rico v. Beard, No. 2:17-cv-1402 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal.). On 23 March 21, defendants in Rico appealed that order. See Rico v. Beard, No. 19-15541 (9th Cir.). On August 29, 2019, this court recommended staying this action pending the resolution of 24 25 the Rico appeal. (ECF No. 80.) The district judge has not yet ruled on that recommendation. Based on this court’s recommendation that this action be stayed, IT IS HEREBY 26 27 ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 68) is denied without 28 //// 1 1 prejudice to its renewal if Judge Mueller’s declines to stay these proceedings or when any stay of 2 the proceedings is lifted. 3 Dated: September 27, 2019 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DLB:9 DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/matt1959.msj deny no prej 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?