Noble v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 10

ORDER Granting Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Application to Extend Deadline to Respond to Complaint re 6 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/16/2014. (Martinez, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Brooke Noble, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and DOES 114 50, inclusive., 15 Defendant. Case No. 1:14-CV-01963---GSA ORDER GRANTING WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.'S APPLICATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Doc. 6) 16 17 Pursuant to Local Rule 144(c), the Court, having read and considered Wells 18 Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo’s”) Ex Parte Application To Extend Deadline To 19 Respond To Complaint, finds that good cause exists for granting Wells Fargo an 20 extension of time to respond to the Complaint. Accordingly, Wells Fargo shall 21 respond to the Complaint on or before December 31, 2014. 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 16, 2014 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP ORDER 948304.01/SF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?