Noble v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
10
ORDER Granting Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Application to Extend Deadline to Respond to Complaint re 6 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/16/2014. (Martinez, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
Brooke Noble,
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and DOES 114 50, inclusive.,
15
Defendant.
Case No. 1:14-CV-01963---GSA
ORDER GRANTING WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A.'S
APPLICATION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
(Doc. 6)
16
17
Pursuant to Local Rule 144(c), the Court, having read and considered Wells
18 Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo’s”) Ex Parte Application To Extend Deadline To
19 Respond To Complaint, finds that good cause exists for granting Wells Fargo an
20 extension of time to respond to the Complaint. Accordingly, Wells Fargo shall
21 respond to the Complaint on or before December 31, 2014.
22
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 16, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble
Mallory & Natsis LLP
ORDER
948304.01/SF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?