Noble v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 10

ORDER Granting Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Application to Extend Deadline to Respond to Complaint re 6 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/16/2014. (Martinez, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

Brooke Noble,
Plaintiff,

12
13

vs.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and DOES 114 50, inclusive.,
15

Defendant.

Case No. 1:14-CV-01963---GSA
ORDER GRANTING WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A.'S
APPLICATION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
(Doc. 6)

16
17

Pursuant to Local Rule 144(c), the Court, having read and considered Wells

18 Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo’s”) Ex Parte Application To Extend Deadline To
19 Respond To Complaint, finds that good cause exists for granting Wells Fargo an
20 extension of time to respond to the Complaint. Accordingly, Wells Fargo shall
21 respond to the Complaint on or before December 31, 2014.
22
23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

December 16, 2014

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
LAW OFFICES

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble
Mallory & Natsis LLP

ORDER
948304.01/SF