Noble v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
155
ORDER STRIKING plaintiff's response to the 3/28/2017 order to show cause, document 153 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/19/2017. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
Case No. 1:14-cv-01963-DAD-EPG
BROOKE NOBLE,
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S
RESPONSE TO MARCH 28, 2017 ORDER
SHOW CAUSE
Plaintiff,
vs.
14
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
(ECF No. 153)
On January 6, 2017, a subpoena was issued to respondent Latif Ziyar, M.D., Inc., c/o
Nari C, 7335 N. First St. #109, Fresno, CA 93720. (ECF No. 123-2.)
The subpoena
commanded production of all documents referring or related to Brook Noble. (ECF No. 123-2,
pp. 5-6.)
Defendant Wells Fargo has filed a motion to enforce the subpoena and/or for sanctions
pursuant to Rule 45(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 123.) The motion
requests a court order holding the respondent in contempt for failing to obey the subpoena
without adequate excuse. (Id.)
On March 28, 2017, the Court ordered respondent “respondent Latif Ziyar, M.D., Inc.”
to show cause “as to why sanctions should not issue for its failure to obey the subpoena issued
January 6, 2017.” ECF No. 150 (emphasis added).
On April 14, 2017, Plaintiff filed what purports to be a response to the order to show
28
1
1
cause on behalf of herself. (ECF No. 153.) The “response” includes 92-pages of statements and
2
exhibits that Plaintiff has already attached in other filings.
3
The Court did not order Plaintiff to file further briefing. The Court specifically ordered
4
Dr. Ziyar to file a response to the order to show cause. ECF No. 150. Counsel for Plaintiff has
5
never indicated that she also represents Dr. Ziyar in this matter.
6
Accordingly, the Court STRIKES Plaintiff’s April 14, 2017 filing in its entirety.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 19, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?