Noble v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 31

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/1/2015 GRANTING plaintiff's 30 Ex Parte Application for leave to file late Opposition. Plaintiff shall filed her papers by 12/30/2015. Defendant shall file Reply, if any, by 1/7/2016. The 12/10/2015 27 Motions to Dismiss Hearing is VACATED and CONTINUED to 1/14/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) on the 15th Floor. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Lenore L. Albert, Esq. SBN 210876 LAW OFFICES OF LENORE ALBERT 7755 Center Avenue, Suite #1100 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Telephone (714) 372-2264 Facsimile (419) 831-3376 Email: LenAlbert@Interactivecounsel.com Attorney for Plaintiff, BROOKE NOBLE 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BROOKE NOBLE CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01963-TLN-EPG 11 12 Plaintiffs, vs. 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; ROBERT LANDUCCI; SCOTT HARRIS; MARLENE HUBBELL; and DOES 4 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER Brooke v Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al 14-cv-01963-TLN-EPG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 The Court, having considered Plaintiffs ex parte application requesting relief from Local Rule 144, Local Rule 230 and Fed. Rule of Civ Proc 6, and good cause appearing therefor, it hereby Orders that Plaintiff has leave to file their opposition to the motion to strike (SLAPP) and motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. Plaintiff shall filed her papers by December 30, 2015. Defendant shall file its reply, if any, by January 7, 2016. The hearing on December 10, 2015 is hereby vacated and continued to January 14, 2016 at 2:00PM in Crtm 2 on the 15th floor of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California located at 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 1, 2015 12 13 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER Brooke v Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al 14-cv-01963-TLN-EPG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?