Noble v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
31
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/1/2015 GRANTING plaintiff's 30 Ex Parte Application for leave to file late Opposition. Plaintiff shall filed her papers by 12/30/2015. Defendant shall file Reply, if any, by 1/7/2016. The 12/10/2015 27 Motions to Dismiss Hearing is VACATED and CONTINUED to 1/14/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) on the 15th Floor. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Lenore L. Albert, Esq. SBN 210876
LAW OFFICES OF LENORE ALBERT
7755 Center Avenue, Suite #1100
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Telephone (714) 372-2264
Facsimile (419) 831-3376
Email: LenAlbert@Interactivecounsel.com
Attorney for Plaintiff, BROOKE NOBLE
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
BROOKE NOBLE
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01963-TLN-EPG
11
12
Plaintiffs,
vs.
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.;
ROBERT LANDUCCI; SCOTT
HARRIS; MARLENE HUBBELL; and
DOES 4 through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER
Brooke v Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
14-cv-01963-TLN-EPG
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
The Court, having considered Plaintiffs ex parte application requesting relief from
Local Rule 144, Local Rule 230 and Fed. Rule of Civ Proc 6, and good cause appearing
therefor, it hereby Orders that Plaintiff has leave to file their opposition to the motion to
strike (SLAPP) and motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. Plaintiff shall filed
her papers by December 30, 2015. Defendant shall file its reply, if any, by January 7,
2016. The hearing on December 10, 2015 is hereby vacated and continued to January 14,
2016 at 2:00PM in Crtm 2 on the 15th floor of the United States District Court, Eastern
District of California located at 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 1, 2015
12
13
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER
Brooke v Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
14-cv-01963-TLN-EPG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?