Noble v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 44

[DISREGARD SEE CLERK'S NOTICE [ 45 ]ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/8/2016 GRANTING Wells Fargo's Motion 43 Dropping Sham Defendants; Robert Landucci, Scott Harris and Marlene Hubbell are hereby DROPPED from this action pursuant to FRCP 21. (Reader, L) Modified on 2/8/2016 (Reader, L).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Brooke Noble, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and DOES 150, inclusive., 15 Defendant. 16 Case No. 1:14-CV-01963-TLN-EPG ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO JUDGE TROY L. NUNLEY ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DROP SHAM DEFENDANTS FROM THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 21 17 18 19 20 Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s ("Wells Fargo") Motion For An Order 21 Dropping Sham Defendants Robert Landucci, Scott Harris, And Marlene Hubbell 22 From This Action Pursuant To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 21 came on 23 regularly for hearing before the Honorable Troy L. Nunley on March 24, 2016. 24 The Court, having read and considered the motion and all opposition and 25 reply papers, finds that the Sham Defendants are not properly joined because: 26 1. Plaintiff failed to obtain the requisite leave of court to add new parties; 27 2. Plaintiff belatedly attempts to add the Sham Defendants for the sole 28 purpose of destroying diversity jurisdiction; and LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP ORDER 3. Plaintiff cannot possibly state a colorable claim against the Sham 1 Defendants. 2 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 4 1. Wells Fargo's motion is GRANTED in all respects; and 5 2. Sham defendants Robert Landucci, Scott Harris, and Marlene Hubbell are 6 hereby dropped from this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 7 Procedure 21. 8 9 Dated: February 8, 2016 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP ORDER -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?