Shaw v. Bhakta, et al.

Filing 9

SECOND STIPULATION and ORDER 8 for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/27/2015. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5

Bruce A. Neilson #096952
7108 N. Fresno St. #410
Fresno, California 93720
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Attorney for Defendants
Suman D. Bhakta and Nutan
S. Bhakta,both individually and dba
Caprice Motel

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

*****
))))

10

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
SUMAN D. BHAKTA, individually and dba )
CAPRICE MOTEL; NUTAN S. BHAKTA, )
individually and dba CAPRICE MOTEL;
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________ )

CASE NO. 1: 14-cv-01965---JLT

CECIL SHAW,
11
12
13
14
15

SECOND STIPULATION AND
PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME FOR SUMAN D. BHAKTA,
individually and dba CAPRICE MOTEL;
and NUTAN S. BHAKTA, individually
and dba CAPRICE MOTEL TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
(Doc 8)

16
WHEREAS:

17
18

1.

Plaintiff CECIL SHAW filed this action on December 10, 2014.

19

2.

This is the second request for an extension of time for SUMAN D. BHAKTA, individually

20

and dba CAPRICE MOTEL; and NUTAN S. BHAKTA, individually and dba CAPRICE MOTEL

21

(“Defendants”). A previous extension of time was granted by the plaintiff within the statutory

22

allowance; thus, court approval is required for a further extension of time.

23

3.

Plaintiff and Defendants are in settlement negotiations at this time.

24

4.

Defendants have obtained a CASp inspection, and are waiting for the report to be written so

25

that a proposed plan of remediation and settlement can be agreed upon.

26

5.

The parties agree that settlement of this case would save valuable court time and resources.

27

6.

The parties have agreed to extend Defendants’ time to respond to the complaint until March

28

11, 2015, subject to the court's approval, and believe that the case can be settled within that
Shaw v. Suman D. Bhakta, et al
2nd Stipulation For Extension of Time

1
Case No. 1: 14-cv-01965

1

time.

2

7.

3

the mandatory scheduling conference.

4

This extension of time will not alter any date or event already set by Court order, including

NOW THEREFORE, Defendants through their attorneys, and Plaintiff Cecil Shaw, through

5

his attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendants SUMAN D. BHAKTA,

6

individually and dba CAPRICE MOTEL; and NUTAN S. BHAKTA, individually and dba

7

CAPRICE MOTEL to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended up to and

8

including March 11, 2015, pending court approval.

9
10

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

11
12

Dated: February 25, 2015

MOORE LAW FIRM, PC
______/s/Tanya Moore
Tanya Moore, Attorney for Plaintiff Cecil Shaw

13
14
15

Dated: February 25, 2015

16

______/s/Bruce A. Neilson
Bruce A. Neilson, Attorney for Defendants
Suman D. Bhakta and Nutan S. Bhakta,both
individually and dba Caprice Motel

17
18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 27, 2015

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Shaw v. Suman D. Bhakta, et al
2nd Stipulation For Extension of Time

2
Case No. 1: 14-cv-01965