Moore v. Hieng et al

Filing 26

THIRD stipulation for extension of time for Defendants Tom Hieng, Gordon K. Tessman, Jean A. Tessman, Douglas Arnold Jorissen, Kimber Lea Jorissen, Stacey Lane Walter and Rithy Sok to respond to complaint; Order thereon, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/23/2015. ( Response due by 4/16/2015) (Rosales, O)

1
2
3
4

Amy R. Lovegren-Tipton (SBN 258697)
LAW OFFICE OF AMY R.
LOVEGREN-TIPTON, APLC
5703 N. West Avenue, Suite 103
Fresno, California 93711
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
6

Attorneys for Defendants TOM HIENG, GORDON K. TESSMAN, JEAN A. TESSMAN,
DOUGLAS ARNOLD JORISSEN, KIMBER LEA JORISSEN, STACEY LANE WALTER,
RITHY SOK

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

)
)
)
)
RONALD MOORE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
TOM HIENG dba SUNSHINE DONUTS;
GORDON K. TESSMAN, Co-Trustee of the )
)
GORDON K. TESSMAN and JEAN A.
TESSMAN REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST )
)
u/d/t November 18, 2010; JEAN A.
)
TESSMAN, Co-Trustee of the GORDON K. )
TESSMAN and JEAN A. TESSMAN
)
REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST u/d/t
)
November 18, 2010; DOUGLAS ARNOLD )
JORISSEN, Co-Trustee of the DOUGLAS
)
ARNOLD JORISSEN AND KIMBER LEA )
JORRISON REVOCABLE TRUST
)
)
AGREEMENT u/d/t August 12, 2010;
KIMBER LEA JORISSEN, Co-Trustee of the )
)
DOUGLAS ARNOLD JORISSEN AND
)
KIMBER LEA JORRISEN REVOCABLE
TRUST AGREEMENT u/d/t August 12, 2010; )
)
STACEY LANE WALTER TRUST u/d/t
)
November 23, 2010; RITHY SOK dba
)
SUNSHINE DONUTS,
)
)
Defendants.
)

Case No.: 1:14-CV-01968 MJS
THIRD STIPULATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TOM HIENG, GORDON
K. TESSMAN, JEAN A. TESSMAN,
DOUGLAS ARNOLD JORISSEN,
KIMBER LEA JORISSEN, STACEY
LANE WALTER AND RITHY SOK TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
ORDER THEREON

27
28

STIPULATION
-1-

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, RONALD MOORE (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants TOM HIENG,

2

GORDON K. TESSMAN, JEAN A. TESSMAN, DOUGLAS ARNOLD JORISSEN, KIMBER

3

LEA JORISSEN, STACEY LANE WALTER and RITHY SOK (“Defendants”) acknowledge

4

that the parties previously stipulated to an extension of time wherein Defendants’ response to

5

the First Amended Complaint is currently due on or before March 30, 2015;

6

WHEREAS, the above-referenced parties are currently evaluating Defendants’ Certified

7

Access Specialist Report and working together to explore all avenues towards settlement. The

8

parties wish to avoid the costs associated with filing responsive pleadings, and conserve the

9

resources of the Court.

10
11
12

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby
stipulate as follows:
1. To an extension of time (i.e., a third extension which, in total, exceeds 28 days)

13

for Defendants to respond to the First Amended Complaint herein, through and including April

14

16, 2015, which extension exceeds the maximum 28 days permissible without leave of Court.

15
16

Dated: March 19, 2015

LAW OFFICE OF AMY R.
LOVEGREN-TIPTON, APLC

17

By/s/Amy R. Lovegren-Tipton
AMY R. LOVEGREN-TIPTON
Attorney for Defendants

18
19
20
21
22

Dated: March 19, 2015

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

23
24
25
26

By/s/ Tanya E. Moore_________
TANYA E. MOORE
Attorney for Plaintiff

27
28

STIPULATION
-2-

1

ORDER

2
3

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ response to the First Amended Complaint

5

is now due on or before April 16, 2015.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9

Dated:

March 23, 2015

/s/

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION
-3-