United States of America v. Approximately $44,000.00 in U.S. Currency

Filing 16

FINAL JUDGMENT of FORFEITURE, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/3/15. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney JEFFREY A. SPIVAK Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 12 15 FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE v. 13 14 CASE NO. 1:14-CV-01985-AWI-SKO APPROXIMATELY $44,000.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Defendant. 16 Pursuant to the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture filed herewith, the Court 17 18 finds: 1. This is a civil forfeiture action against Approximately $44,000.00 in U.S. Currency 19 20 (hereafter “Defendant Currency”). 2. A Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem was filed on December 12, 2014, 21 22 alleging that said Defendant Currency is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 23 881(a)(6). 3. On December 15, 2014, the Clerk issued a Warrant for Arrest for the Defendant 24 25 Currency. The warrant for the Defendant Currency was duly executed on December 18, 26 2014. 27 4. Beginning on December 18, 2014, for at least 30 consecutive days, the United States 28 published notice of this action on the official government forfeiture site www.forfeiture.gov. A Final Judgment of Forfeiture 1 1 2 3 Declaration of Publication was filed on February 23, 2015. 5. In addition to public notice on the official internet government forfeiture site www.forfeiture.gov, actual notice or attempted notice was given to the following individuals: 4 a. Fabian Martinez 5 b. Kirk McAllister, Attorney at Law 6 c. Joanna Cardenas 7 8 9 7. To date, no parties have filed claims or answers in this matter, and the time in which any person or entity may file a claim and answer has expired. 8. On March 2, 2015, the United States sought and obtained a Clerk’s Entry of 10 Default against Joanna Cardenas. Pursuant to Local Rule 540, the United States and 11 Potential Claimant Fabian Martinez thus join in a request that as part of the Final 12 Judgment of Forfeiture in this case the Court enter a Default Judgment against the 13 interests, if any, of Joanna Cardenas. 14 9. Potential Claimant represents and warrants that he is the sole owner of the 15 Defendant Currency and that no other person or entity has any legitimate claim of interest 16 therein. 17 18 10. No other parties have filed claims or answers in this matter, and the time for which any person or entity may file a claim and answer has expired. 19 Based on the above findings, and the files and records of the Court, it is hereby 20 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 21 1. The Court adopts the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture entered into by 22 23 and between the parties to this action. 2. That judgment is hereby entered against Potential Claimant Fabian Martinez, 24 Joanna Cardenas and all other potential claimants who have not filed claims in this action. 25 3. Upon entry of a Final Judgment of Forfeiture $40,000.00 in U.S. Currency of the 26 Defendant Currency, together with any interest that may have accrued on the full amount of 27 the Defendant Currency, shall be forfeited to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 28 881(a)(6), to be disposed of according to law. Final Judgment of Forfeiture 2 4. Upon entry of a Final Judgment of Forfeiture herein, but not later than 90 days 1 2 after the Court issues the Final Judgment of Forfeiture or 90 days after Potential Claimant 3 has provided the necessary electronic funds transfer paperwork—whichever is later, $4,000.00 4 of the Defendant Currency, shall be returned to Potential Claimant via his counsel of record, 5 Mr. Kirk McAllister at 1012 11th Street, Modesto, CA 95354. 5. Plaintiff United States of America and its servants, agents, and employees, 6 7 and all other Public entities, their servants, agents, and employees, are released from any and 8 all liability, arising out of or in any way connected with the seizure, arrest, or forfeiture of the 9 Defendant Currency. This is a full and final release applying to all unknown and 10 unanticipated injuries, and/or damages arising out of said seizure, arrest, or forfeiture, as well 11 as to those now known or disclosed. The parties waived the provisions of California Civil Code 12 § 1542. 6. That pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and the allegations set forth in the 13 14 Complaint filed on or about December 12, 2014, the Court finds that there was reasonable 15 cause for the seizure and arrest of the Defendant Currency, and for the commencement and 16 prosecution of this forfeiture action, and a Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 17 U.S.C. § 2465 shall be entered accordingly. 7. Pursuant to the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture entered into between 18 19 the parties, no party “substantially prevailed” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2465. All 20 parties shall bear their own costs and attorney’s fees. 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Final Judgment of Forfeiture 3 1 2 8. The Court shall maintain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Final Judgment of Forfeiture. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: April 3, 2015 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE CAUSE Based upon the allegations set forth in the Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem filed December 12, 2014, and the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture filed herewith, this Court enters this Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465, that there was reasonable cause for the seizure or arrest of the Defendant Currency, and for the commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 Dated: April 3, 2015 17 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Final Judgment of Forfeiture 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?