Hauseur v. Clark et al

Filing 55

ORDER After Initial Scheduling Conference re 16 , 23 , 51 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/10/17. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 12 1:14-cv-01987-DAD-EPG (PC) MARK HAUSEUR, Plaintiff, ORDER AFTER INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (ECF NOS. 16, 23, & 51) v. NATALIE CLARK, et al., Defendants. 13 14 Mark Hauseur (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 15 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which includes state law claims. On March 6, 2017, 16 the Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference (“Conference”) in Feiger v. Smith (1:14-cv- 17 01920) and Hauseur v. Clark (1:14-cv-01987). Mark Hauseur telephonically appeared on his 18 own behalf. Robert Feiger telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Counsel Jonathan Paul 19 telephonically appeared on behalf of defendant Smith, counsel Thomas Feher appeared 20 telephonically on behalf of defendant Clark, and counsel Kathleen Williams appeared 21 telephonically on behalf of defendant Graves. Counsel Justin Walker and Tracy Hendrickson, 22 both of whom are with the Office of the Attorney General, specially appeared. 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the reasons stated on the record at the Conference, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff’s request for sanctions against the Office of the Attorney General (ECF No. 16, pgs. 7-8) is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff’s motion to compel compliance with court order setting settlement conference (ECF No. 23) is DENIED as moot; 3. The Office of the Attorney General is to promptly send all of the documents 1 1 it has received that are related to this case to Kathleen Williams. Defense 2 counsel are to meet and confer, and compile one set of documents from the 3 documents that they have each received that are related to this case. If any 4 documents are withheld as privilege, a privilege log must be included. 5 Within forty-five days of the date of service of this order, Kathleen Williams 6 is to bates stamp that set of documents, and send a bates stamped copy of 7 that set of documents to Plaintiff and each other defense counsel; 8 4. Within fourteen days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiff is to 9 provide all relevant documents he has related to his case and Robert Feiger’s 10 case to Jonathon Paul. In a separate order, Robert Feiger will be ordered to 11 provide all relevant documents he has related to his case only to Jonathon 12 Paul. Within forty-five days of the date of service of this order, Jonathon 13 Paul is to compile those documents, bates stamp them, and send a bates 14 stamped copy of that set of documents to Plaintiff and each other defense 15 counsel; 16 5. All documents that Plaintiff and Robert Feiger send to Jonathon Paul are to 17 be compiled, with a complete copy going to both Plaintiff and Robert Feiger, 18 unless Plaintiff or Robert Feiger specifically mark particular documents that 19 should not be sent to the other; 20 6. Plaintiff is to give authorization for defense counsel to request his relevant 21 medical records. To the extent that defense counsel obtains medical records 22 pre-dating Plaintiff’s incarceration at Corcoran State Prison, defense counsel 23 must treat those documents as “attorney’s eyes only.” 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 10, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?