Thomas v. Smith et al

Filing 11

ORDER RELATING CASES and REASSIGNING Action to District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill and Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/20/2015. New Case No. 1:14-cv-2002-LJO-GSA(PC). (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MELVIN THOMAS, Plaintiff, 11 12 Case No. 1:14-cv-02002 AWI DLB PC New Case No. 1:14-cv-2002 LJO GSA PC v. 13 MARLENE SMITH, et al., 14 ORDER RELATING CASES AND REASSIGNING ACTION TO DISTRICT JUDGE LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL AND MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY S. AUSTIN Defendants. _____________________________________/ 15 16 Plaintiff Larry William Cortinas is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 17 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 16, 2014, the action was removed to 18 this Court from state court. (ECF 1.) 19 The Court’s review of this action reveals that it is related under Local Rule 123 to the 20 action entitled Sands v. Smith, 1:14-cv-01780-LJO-GSA. These actions are based on the same 21 underlying facts and involve overlapping questions of law and fact. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. The Office of the Clerk shall relate this case with case 1:14-cv-01780-LJO-GSA; 24 2. This case shall be reassigned to the docket of District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill and the 25 docket of Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin; 26 27 28 3. The new case number shall be: 1:14-cv-02002 LJO GSA PC 1 and all future pleadings and/or correspondence must be so numbered. Use of an incorrect 2 case number or incorrect judge’s initials may result in delay in processing documents and 3 distribution of copies to the judge assigned. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis March 20, 2015 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?