Green v. California Pride, Inc.

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/20/2015 ORDERING that this action is STAYED and all dates set forth in the Court's Status (Pre-Trial) Scheduling Order are VACATED. Defendant shall either file a Notice of Filing Bankrup tcy in this action as a result of its bankruptcy filing on or before 8/3/2015, or the parties shall file a Joint Status Report explaining the delay or change in circumstances on or before 8/10/2015. Should Defendant file its Notice of Filing Bankru ptcy in this action on or before 8/3/2015, subject to the automatic stay, Plaintiff shall, every 90 days thereafter, file a Status Report with the Court until such time as the matter is put back on calendar or the action is dismissed. CASE STAYED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone: (408) 298-2000 Facsimile: (408) 298-6046 Email: Tanya@moorelawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, Lawrence Green WALTER & WILHELM LAW GROUP A Professional Corporation Riley C. Walter #91839 205 E. River Park Circle, Suite 410 Fresno, CA 93720 Telephone: (559) 435-9800 Facsimile: (559) 435-9868 E-mail: rileywalter@W2LG.com Attorneys for Defendant, California Pride, Inc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CALIFORNIA PRIDE, INC., dba CEDAR & ) ) ASHLAN BUGGY CLEAN, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) LAWRENCE GREEN, No. 1:14-cv-02006-JAM-GSA STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION AND VACATE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER DUE TO DEFENDANT’S IMMINENT BANKRUPTCY FILING; ORDER 22 Plaintiff Lawrence Green (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant California Pride, Inc., dba Cedar 23 & Ashlan Buggy Clean (“Defendant,” and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and 24 through their respective attorneys of record, hereby represent and stipulate as follows: 25 WHEREAS, this action arises out of Plaintiff’s claim, all of which are disputed by 26 Defendant, that Defendant discriminated against him in violation of Title III of the Americans 27 with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq. (“ADA”) and related California law. 28 Specifically, Plaintiff, who is substantially limited in his ability to walk and uses a wheelchair STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION AND VACATE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER DUE TO DEFENDANT’S IMMINENT BANKRUPTCY FILING; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 1 1 for mobility, alleges that he encountered conditions at the public accommodation known as 2 Ashlan Buggy Clean, located in Fresno, California (“the Facility”), that prevented his full and 3 equal access to the Facility. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief under state and federal law, 4 damages under state law, and the recovery of his attorneys’ fees, costs, and litigation expenses 5 as permitted by statute; 6 7 WHEREAS, the Court issued a Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order (“Scheduling Order”) in this action on March 17, 2015 (Dkt. 13); 8 WHEREAS, on May 8, 2015, Plaintiff conducted a formal inspection of the Facility 9 for the purpose of determining whether additional barriers to his full and equal access (in 10 addition to those he alleged in his initial complaint to have personally encountered) existed at 11 the Facility and was the process of amending his complaint to allege such additionally 12 discovered conditions; 13 14 15 16 WHEREAS, on or about May 13, 2015, Defendant advised Plaintiff that it intends to file for bankruptcy; WHEREAS, Defendant hereby represents that it intends to file for bankruptcy within the next 75 days; 17 WHEREAS, neither party wishes to incur additional fees and costs prosecuting and 18 defending this action where bankruptcy is imminent and will automatically stay the action, and 19 the Parties wish to conserve their resources as well as those of the Court pending the outcome 20 of the bankruptcy; 21 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that this matter be 22 stayed, and that all dates set forth in the Scheduling Order be vacated. Should Defendant not 23 file bankruptcy and a Notice of Filing Bankruptcy in this action on or before August 3, 2015, 24 the Parties shall file a Joint Status Report explaining the delay or change in circumstances on 25 or before August 10, 2015. Should Defendant file for bankruptcy and file the Notice of Filing 26 Bankruptcy in this action as anticipated, subject to the automatic stay of 11 § U.S.C. 362, 27 Plaintiff shall file a Status Report every 90 days until the matter is either put back on calendar 28 or dismissed. STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION AND VACATE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER DUE TO DEFENDANT’S IMMINENT BANKRUPTCY FILING; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 2 1 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: May 20, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 3 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff, Lawrence Green 4 5 6 WALTER & WILHELM LAW GROUP, a Professional Corporation 7 8 /s/ Riley C. Walter Riley C. Walter Attorneys for Defendant, California Pride, Inc., dba Cedar & Ashlan Buggy Clean 9 10 11 12 ORDER 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. This action is stayed and all dates set forth in the Court’s Status (Pre-Trial) Scheduling Order are vacated. 2. Defendant shall either file a Notice of Filing Bankruptcy in this action as a result of its bankruptcy filing on or before August 3, 2015, or the parties shall file a Joint Status Report explaining the delay or change in circumstances on or before August 10, 2015. 3. Should Defendant file its Notice of Filing Bankruptcy in this action on or before August 3, 2015, subject to the automatic stay, Plaintiff shall, every 90 days thereafter, file a Status Report with the Court until such time as the matter is put back on calendar or the action is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: May 20, 2015 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION AND VACATE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER DUE TO DEFENDANT’S IMMINENT BANKRUPTCY FILING; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?