Howard Sipe et al v. King et al
Filing
17
ORDER For Plaintiff Howard Sipe To Submit A Non-Prisoner Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis Or Pay The $400.00 Filing Fee Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/10/2015. (Motion for IFP due by 3/13/2015) (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application)(Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
1:14-cv-02016-LJO-MJS (PC)
HOWARD SIPE, et al.,
Plaintiff,
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF HOWARD SIPE
TO SUBMIT A NON-PRISONER
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS OR PAY THE $400.00 FILING
FEE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
v.
AUDREY KING, et al. ,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff Howard Sipe is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and
19
Institutions Code ' 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the
20
meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th
21
Cir. 2000).
22
Plaintiff has not paid the $400.00 filing fee, or submitted an application to proceed
23
in forma pauperis on the appropriate form pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915. Accordingly, IT
24
IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
26
27
28
1.
The Clerk=s Office shall send to plaintiff the attached form for application to
proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner;
2.
Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit
the completed and signed application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner,
1
or in the alternative, pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to comply with
1
this order will result in dismissal of this action.
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated:
February 10, 2015
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?