Tillery v. Lollis et al

Filing 38

Stipulation for PROTECTIVE ORDER re: Confidentiality of Discovery Materials, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/19/2015. (Herman, H)

1 David J. Duchrow, Bar No. 105617
Jill A. Piano, Bar No. 193980
2 DUCHROW & PIANO, LLP
2510 Main Street, Suite 205
3
Santa Monica, California 90405
4 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
5 Emails: [e-mail], [e-mail]
6 María G. Díaz, SBN 220087
Kirby Fernando Cañon, SBN 276414
7 THE DIAZ LAW FIRM
8 7045 N. Maple Ave., Suite 107
Fresno, California 93720
9 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
10 Emails: [e-mail], [e-mail]
11 Attorneys for PLAINTIFF, CLYDE TILLERY
12 Jesse J. Maddox, Bar No. 219091
[e-mail]
13
Kimberly A. Horiuchi, Bar No. 214869
14 [e-mail]
LIBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE
15 A Professional Law Corporation
5250 North Palm Ave., Suite 310
16 Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: [phone]
17
Facsimile: 559.449.4535
18
Attorneys for DEFENDANTS, JOHN D. LOLLIS, CITY OF PORTERVILLE, CITY
19 OF PORTERVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT, MARIO GARCIA and GLENN IRISH
20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

21

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

22 CLYDE TILLERY,

CASE No. 1:14-cv-02025-KJM-BAM

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE
ORDER RE: CONFIDENTIALITY OF
DISCOVERY MATERIALS

25 JOHN D. LOLLIS; MARIO GARCIA;
CITY OF PORTERVILLE; GLEN
26 IRISH; CITY OF PORTERVILLE
FIRE DEPARTMENT; and DOES 1
27 through 20, inclusive,

Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller, United States,
District Court Judge, Sacramento, CA

23
v.

24

Defendants.

28

ORDER

Second Amended Complaint Filed:
September 2, 2015
Trial Date: February 13, 2017

Page 1

1

Having considered the stipulated protective order filed on November 16, 2015, in

2 this action, Clyde Tillery v. City of Porterville, et al., U.S. District Court for the Eastern
3 District, Case No. 1:14-cv-02205-KJM-BAM, the Court adopts the protective order in its
4 entirety subject to the following limitation pursuant to Local Rule 141:
5

All parties shall comply with the requirements of Eastern District Local Rule 141 in

6 the event that a party would like Confidential Material to be sealed in court filings. In lieu
7 of seeking a motion to seal, the parties may agree to redact the Confidential Material
8 contemplated by the stipulated protective order.
9 IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated:

November 19, 2015

/s/ Barbara

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE