Tillery v. Lollis et al

Filing 56

Order GRANTING leave to exceed page limits, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/1/2016. Defendants City, PFD, and Irish, collectively, may file an opening brief in support of their motion for summary judgment, not to exceed thirty (30) pages; In response to defendants City, PFD, and Irishs motion, plaintiff may file an opposition brief, not to exceed thirty (30) pages. (Rosales, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLYDE TILLERY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 No. 1:14-cv-02025-DAD-BAM v. ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS JOHN D. LOLLIS, CITY OF PORTERVILLE, CITY OF PORTERVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT, MARIO GARCIA, and GLENN IRISH, (Doc. No. 51) Defendants. 17 18 19 Before the court is a request for leave to exceed the page limits for briefs set by the court’s 20 amended status order filed on behalf of defendants City of Porterville (“City”), City of Porterville 21 Fire Department (“PFD”), and Glenn Irish. (Doc. No. 51.) Finding good cause, the court grants 22 relief from the page limitation with respect to briefs related to the anticipated motion for summary 23 judgment to be filed on behalf of these defendants. Accordingly, 1. Defendants City, PFD, and Irish, collectively, may file an opening brief in support of 24 their motion for summary judgment, not to exceed thirty (30) pages; 25 2. In response to defendants City, PFD, and Irish’s motion, plaintiff may file an 26 opposition brief, not to exceed thirty (30) pages; and 27 28 ///// 1 1 3. All other papers in this case shall be filed in accordance with the page limitations set 2 3 4 forth in the amended status order (Doc. No. 41). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 1, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?