Jones v. Jimenez et al
Filing
130
ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's 129 Response to Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/27/2019. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
JEREMY JONES,
Plaintiff,
9
10
v.
11
JIMENEZ, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
14
Case No. 1:14-cv-02045-DAD-SAB (PC)
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ECF No. 129]
Plaintiff Jeremy Jones is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
17
On February 25, 2019, Plaintiff filed a response to Defendant’s reply to Plaintiff’s opposition
18
to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 129.) The Court construes this filing as a
19
surreply. No further briefing on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is permitted absent leave
20
of court. The Court did not grant Plaintiff leave to file a surreply, and no further briefing on the
21
motion is warranted. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s surreply (ECF No. 129) is HEREBY STRICKEN from
22
the record.
23
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 27, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?