Jones v. Jimenez et al

Filing 58

ORDER Directing Defendants to File a Response to Plaintiff's 57 Third Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/16/17. 21-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JEREMY JONES, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 JIMENEZ, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:14-cv-02045-DAD-SAB (PC) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER [ECF No. 57] Plaintiff Jeremy Jones is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 15 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s third amended complaint, filed May 8, 2017. 16 On March 7, 2017, the Court granted in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and 17 granted Plaintiff leave to file a third amended complaint as to his conditions of confinement claim 18 only. The Court has screened Plaintiff’s third amended complaint, filed May 8, 2017, pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 1915A, and finds that Plaintiff states a cognizable due process claim and conditions of 20 confinement claim against Defendants Lundy and Schuyler. Defendants Lundy and Schuyler shall file 21 a response to Plaintiff’s third amended complaint, filed May 8, 2017, within twenty-one (21) days 22 from the date of service of this order. 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 16, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?