Jones v. Jimenez et al

Filing 58

ORDER Directing Defendants to File a Response to Plaintiff's 57 Third Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/16/17. 21-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

JEREMY JONES,

8

Plaintiff,

9

v.

10

JIMENEZ, et al.,

11

Defendants.

12
13
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-02045-DAD-SAB (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED
COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS
FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER
[ECF No. 57]

Plaintiff Jeremy Jones is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

15

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s third amended complaint, filed May 8, 2017.

16

On March 7, 2017, the Court granted in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and

17

granted Plaintiff leave to file a third amended complaint as to his conditions of confinement claim

18

only. The Court has screened Plaintiff’s third amended complaint, filed May 8, 2017, pursuant to 28

19

U.S.C. § 1915A, and finds that Plaintiff states a cognizable due process claim and conditions of

20

confinement claim against Defendants Lundy and Schuyler. Defendants Lundy and Schuyler shall file

21

a response to Plaintiff’s third amended complaint, filed May 8, 2017, within twenty-one (21) days

22

from the date of service of this order.

23
24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 16, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1