Jones v. Jimenez et al

Filing 79

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Request for Copy of Case Law signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/26/2017. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEREMY JONES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 JIMENEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:14-cv-02045-DAD-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR COPY OF CASE LAW [ECF No. 78] Plaintiff Jeremy Jones is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 23, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice to the Court indicating that he has attempted to 20 obtain a copy of a case referenced at the September 18, 2017 (Williams v. Anderson, No. 1:10-cv- 21 01250-SAB (PC), 2016 WL 739471) settlement conference but he has been able to locate it. Plaintiff 22 requests that the Court send him a copy of the referenced case. Plaintiff is advised that the Court does 23 not provide free copies of case documents to parties. The Clerk of Court charges $.50 per page for 24 copies of documents. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Copies of up to twenty pages may be made by the 25 Clerk Office at this Court upon written request and prepayment of the copy fees. The fact that the 26 Court has granted leave for Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis does not entitle him to free copies of 27 documents from the Court. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2250, the Clerk is not required to furnish copies 28 without costs to an indigent plaintiff except by order of the judge. 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for a copy of a case from 1 2 Westlaw is DENIED. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 October 26, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?