Neal v. Director of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Request for Screening Order and for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading 3 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/29/14. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SEAN BAPTISTE NEAL,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
DIRECTOR OF DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
AND REHABILITATIONS, et al.,
Case No. 1:14-cv-02067---JLT (PC)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'
REQUEST FOR SCREENING ORDER AND
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
RESPONSIVE PLEADING
(Doc. 3)
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, Sean Baptiste Neal, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
17
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff originally filed this action in Kern County Superior
19
Court, but on December 22, 2014, Defendants removed the action to this Court. (Doc. 1.) That
20
same day, Defendants filed a motion requesting that the action be screened per 28 U.S.C. §
21
1915A and that they be allowed to file a response to Plaintiff's pleading thirty days if it "survives
22
the Court's screening. . . ." (Doc. 3.)
23
It is true that 28 U.S.C. § 1915A applies to this action and requires the court to screen all
24
civil actions filed by prisoners seeking redress from a governmental officer, employee, or entity.
25
Thus, Defendants' request for screening is properly granted. Further, until cognizable claims have
26
been found to be stated against them, Defendants are not required to file a responsive pleading.
27
///
28
//
1
1
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Request for Screening Order
2
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, filed on December 22, 2014 (Doc. 3), is GRANTED. As necessary,
3
the Court will set a responsive pleading deadline. Until that time, no responsive pleading shall
4
be filed.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 29, 2014
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?