Williams v. Andrade et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and DISMISSING Defendants May, Silveira, Webster, Andrade and Deathridge signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/21/2016. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GERRY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

Case No. 1:14-cv-2073-AWI-SAB-PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF No.17)

v.
W. OXBORROW, et al.,

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

18 § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
19 636(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20

On February 19, 2016, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that

21 Defendants Andrade, Webster, Silveira, May, and Deathridge be dismissed from this action for
22 Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Plaintiff was provided an
23 opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings
24 and recommendations.
25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this

26 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27 Court finds the record to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
28

1

1

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

2

1.

19, 2016, are adopted in full; and

3
4

The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on February

2.

Defendants Andrade, Webster, Silveira, May, and Deathridge are DISMISSED

5

from this action, due to the failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

6

granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 Dated: June 21, 2016

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2