Gutierrez v. Tate, et al.

Filing 19

ORDER DENYING 18 Plaintiff's Motion for Reimbursement of Funds as Moot, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/28/2023. (Maldonado, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

RAY GUTIERREZ,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

v.
HAROLD TATE, et al.,

13

No. 1:14-cv-02077-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDS AS
MOOT
(ECF No. 18)

Defendants.

14
On May 3, 2016, the instant action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was dismissed for

15
16

failure to prosecute and failure to state a cognizable claim for relief, and judgment was entered

17

this same date. (ECF Nos. 15, 16.)
On April 27, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting to be reimbursed funds that were

18
19

deduced as overpayment in this case. (ECF No. 18.) Based on a review of the Court’s financial

20

records, Plaintiff was provided a reimbursement of $32.13 as overpayment toward the filing fee

21

in this case on May 12, 2023. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for reimbursement of funds is

22

denied as moot.

23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 28, 2023
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1