King v. Meek
Filing
10
ORDER DISMISSING Complaint with Prejudice and Entering Judgment in Favor of Defendant signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/16/2015. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARK W. KING;
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-02079-AWI-GSA
Honorable Anthony W. Ishii
Courtroom 2
v.
JOHN B. MEEK,
15
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH
PREJUDICE AND ENTERING
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT
Defendant.
16
17
Date Removed: December 29, 2014
18
19
20
21
The Order granting Defendant John B. Meek’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint pursuant to
22
Rule 12(b)(2) and 12 (b)(6) was entered by this Court on June 10, 2015. The Court granted Plaintiff
23
Mark W. King, Esq. (State Bar No. 242197) leave to amend his complaint within thirty days of
24
entry of that Order. Accordingly, Plaintiff was required to file his amended complaint on or before
25
July 10, 2015.
26
///
27
///
28
///
JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT
1
Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint and therefore, the complaint in this matter is
2
dismissed with prejudice and judgment is entered in favor of Defendant John B. Meek and against
3
Plaintiff Mark W. King. Defendant is awarded and shall recover his costs of suit.1
4
5
This Order terminates the case. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this
case.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 16, 2015
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The Local Rules of the Eastern District of California state that “[c]osts shall be taxed in
conformity with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1920.” L.R. 292(a); see Fed.R.Civ.P. 54.
2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?