Sprout v. Ho et al

Filing 9

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action should not be Dismissed for Failure to Keep Court Apprised of Current Address; Twenty-One Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/15/2016. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD B. SPROUT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 Case No. 1:14-cv-02089 DLB PC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO KEEP COURT APPRISED OF CURRENT ADDRESS HO, et al., TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Richard B. Sprout (“Plaintiff”) is an inmate in the Stanislaus County Jail proceeding 18 pro se and in forma pauperis in this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on 19 December 31, 2014.1 On October 16, 2015, the Court screened Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and ordered 20 21 him to return service documents within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. On November 6, 2015, Plaintiff’s mail was returned to this Court by the United States Postal 22 23 Service with a notation, “Undeliverable, RTS: Not deliverable as addressed-Not in custody.” Plaintiff has not provided the Court with a current address as required by Local Rule 183(b), 24 25 or otherwise contacted the Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERD TO SHOW CAUSE, if any he has, why this action should 26 27 not be dismissed for failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address. Plaintiff shall file a 28 1 Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge on January 16, 2015. 1 1 response to this order within twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of this order. Plaintiff may 2 also comply with this order by notifying the Court of his current address. 3 Failure to file a response will result in dismissal of this action. 4 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis January 15, 2016 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?