Harris v. Kearney Palms LLC, et al.
Filing
39
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION with prejudice; ORDER, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/5/2015. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Nona Harris
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NONA HARRIS,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
vs.
KEARNEY PALMS LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
) No. 1:15-cv-00019-AWI-MJS
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Nona Harris and Defendants
2
Kearney Palms LLC; Salah Almontser aka Salah Almonster dba 559 Cigarettes & More; and
3
Miguel Vaca aka Miguel Aranda dba Rocio’s Mexican Food, the parties remaining in this
4
action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
5
Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its
6
entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
7
8
Dated: November 5, 2015
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
9
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Nona Harris
10
11
12
13
Dated: November 5, 2015
LANG, RICHERT & PATCH
14
15
/s/ Kimberly L. Mayhew
Kimberly L. Mayhew
Attorneys for Defendants,
Kearney Palms LLC; Salah Almontser aka
Salah Almonster dba 559 Cigarettes & More;
and Miguel Vaca aka Miguel Aranda dba
Rocio’s Mexican Food
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER
21
22
The parties having so stipulated,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
24
Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 5, 2015
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?