Moore v. Ross Dress For Less, Inc. et al.

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER to EXTEND the Time for Defendants to Respond to the Complaint and to Continue the Scheduling Conference. Defendants shall have until April 24, 2015, to respond to the Complaint; the April 7, 2015 Scheduling Conference is contin ued until May 21, 2015, at 10:15 a.m., in Courtroom 7; and the parties shall file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior to the date set for the Scheduling Conference. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/25/2015. (Timken, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

FRESNO DIVISION

16
17

RONALD MOORE,

18

Plaintiff,

19

v.

20

ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, INC., dba
ROSS DRESS FOR LESS #163; CLOVIS
SHAW PARTNERS, LLC, operating in
California as CLOVIS SHAW 26, LLC,

21

Case No. 1:15-CV-00021-AWI-SKO
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO
RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND TO
CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
Complaint Served:

January 7, 2015

22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER

1:15-CV-00021

1

Plaintiff Ronald Moore (“Plaintiff”), Defendant Clovis Shaw Partners, LLC, and Defendant

2

Ross Dress for Less, Inc., by and through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to an extension of

3

time so that Defendants shall have until April 24, 2015, to respond to the Complaint. Additionally,

4

the parties respectfully request that the Court continue the Scheduling Conference, currently set for

5

April 7, 2015, to a date convenient for the Court on or after May 8, 2015.

6

Good cause exists for these extensions because a Certified Access Specialist inspected the

7

property in question on March 13, 2015, and the parties are in the process of reviewing the CASp

8

Inspection Report, evaluating the alleged access barriers set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint, and

9

discussing the possibility of an informal, global resolution of this dispute without the time and

10

expense of further litigation. In particular, permitting these extensions of time will allow Defendants

11

avoid the cost of preparing a formal response to the Complaint if the parties are able to resolve this

12

dispute prior to April 24, 2015, and will also permit the parties to avoid the time and expense of

13

preparing a joint status report and attending a Scheduling Conference if the parties are able to reach

14

a global resolution prior to April 24, 2015.

15

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

16
17

Dated: March 24, 2015

/s/ Tanya E. Moore [with permission]
TANYA E. MOORE
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RONALD MOORE

Dated: March 24, 2015

/s/ Brady K. McGuinness [with permission]
BRADY K. MCGUINNESS
BETTS, RUBIN & MCGUINNESS
Attorneys for Defendant
CLOVIS SHAW PARTNERS, LLC

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER

1.

1:15-CV-00021

1
2

Dated: March 24, 2015
/s/ Michael G. Leggieri
MICHAEL G. LEGGIERI
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, INC.

3
4
5
6

ORDER

7
8

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Defendants shall have until April 24, 2015, to respond to the Complaint;

9

2. The April 7, 2015 Scheduling Conference is continued until May 21, 2015, at 10:15

10

a.m., in Courtroom 7; and

11

3. The parties shall file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior to

12

the date set for the Scheduling Conference.

13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
16

Dated:

March 25, 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER

2.

1:15-CV-00021