Perrotte v. Johnson et al
Filing
202
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 201 Motion to File a Surreply signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/08/2019. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JEFFREY P. PERROTTE,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
STACEY JOHNSON, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:15-cv-00026-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO
FILE A SURREPLY
[ECF No. 201]
Plaintiff Jeffrey P. Perrotte is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On October 4, 2019, Plaintiff filed a request to file a surreply. Parties do not have the right to
20
file surreplies and motions are deemed submitted when the time to reply has expired. Local Rule
21
230(l). The Court generally views motions for leave to file a surreply with disfavor. Hill v. England,
22
No. CVF05869 REC TAG, 2005 WL 3031136, at *1 (E.D. Cal. 2005) (citing Fedrick v. Mercedes-
23
Benz USA, LLC, 366 F.Supp.2d 1190, 1197 (N.D. Ga. 2005)). However, district courts have the
24
discretion to either permit or preclude a surreply. See U.S. ex rel. Meyer v. Horizon Health Corp., 565
25
F.3d 1195, 1203 (9th Cir. 2009) (district court did not abuse discretion in refusing to permit
26
“inequitable surreply”); JG v. Douglas County School Dist., 552 F.3d 786, 803 n.14 (9th Cir. 2008)
27
(district court did not abuse discretion in denying leave to file surreply where it did not consider new
28
evidence in reply); Provenz v. Miller, 102 F.3d 1478, 1483 (9th Cir. 1996) (new evidence in reply may
1
1
not be considered without giving the non-movant an opportunity to respond). Inasmuch as on October
2
3, 2019, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that Defendant’s motion for
3
summary judgment be denied, Plaintiff’s motion to file a surreply is denied as moot.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
7
October 8, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?