Perrotte v. Johnson et al

Filing 202

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 201 Motion to File a Surreply signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/08/2019. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY P. PERROTTE, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. STACEY JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:15-cv-00026-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO FILE A SURREPLY [ECF No. 201] Plaintiff Jeffrey P. Perrotte is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 4, 2019, Plaintiff filed a request to file a surreply. Parties do not have the right to 20 file surreplies and motions are deemed submitted when the time to reply has expired. Local Rule 21 230(l). The Court generally views motions for leave to file a surreply with disfavor. Hill v. England, 22 No. CVF05869 REC TAG, 2005 WL 3031136, at *1 (E.D. Cal. 2005) (citing Fedrick v. Mercedes- 23 Benz USA, LLC, 366 F.Supp.2d 1190, 1197 (N.D. Ga. 2005)). However, district courts have the 24 discretion to either permit or preclude a surreply. See U.S. ex rel. Meyer v. Horizon Health Corp., 565 25 F.3d 1195, 1203 (9th Cir. 2009) (district court did not abuse discretion in refusing to permit 26 “inequitable surreply”); JG v. Douglas County School Dist., 552 F.3d 786, 803 n.14 (9th Cir. 2008) 27 (district court did not abuse discretion in denying leave to file surreply where it did not consider new 28 evidence in reply); Provenz v. Miller, 102 F.3d 1478, 1483 (9th Cir. 1996) (new evidence in reply may 1 1 not be considered without giving the non-movant an opportunity to respond). Inasmuch as on October 2 3, 2019, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that Defendant’s motion for 3 summary judgment be denied, Plaintiff’s motion to file a surreply is denied as moot. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 7 October 8, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?