Perrotte v. Johnson et al

Filing 31

ORDER Adopting 28 Findings and Recommendation, Denying Defendant Hebron's Motion to Dismiss 14 , and Directing Defendant Hebron to File an Answer to the Complaint Within Twenty Days from the Date of Service of this Order, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/27/16. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JEFFREY P. PERROTTE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
STACEY JOHNSON, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:15-cv-00026-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, DENYING DEFENDANT
HEBRON’S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND
DIRECTING DEFENDANT HEBRON TO FILE
AN ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT WITHIN
TWENTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE
OF THIS ORDER
[ECF Nos. 14, 28]

Plaintiff Jeffrey P. Perrotte is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

20

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 14, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

21

Recommendation recommending that Defendant Hebron’s motion to dismiss be denied. The Findings

22

and Recommendation was served on the parties and contained notice that objections were to be filed

23

within thirty days. The thirty day time frame has expired and no objections were filed.

24

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

25

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

26

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendation, filed on March 14, 2016, is adopted in full; and

3

2.

Defendant Hebron’s motion to dismiss is DENIED; and

4

3.

Defendant Hebron shall file an answer to the complaint within twenty (20) days from
the date of service of this order.

5
6
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

April 27, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2