Perrotte v. Johnson et al
Filing
53
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Thirty Days from the Date of Service of this Order to FILE an Opposition to Defendant Hebron's Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/11/2016. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JEFFREY P. PERROTTE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
STACEY JOHNSON, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Case No.: 1:15-cv-00026-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF THIRTY
DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF
THIS ORDER TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT HEBRON’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ECF No. 48]
Plaintiff Jeffrey P. Perrotte is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On August 22, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to
19
20
Defendants Johnson and LeFlore’s motion to vacate the entry of default and an opposition to
21
Defendant Hebron’s pending motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 48.)
On August 24, 2016, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time as the Court
22
23
had previously issued Findings and Recommendations regarding Defendants’ motion to vacate the
24
entry of default after it was deemed submitted to the Court for review. Upon further review of the
25
record, the Court neglected to consider Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file an opposition
26
to Defendant Hebron’s motion for summary judgment.
27
///
28
///
1
Good cause having been presented to the Court, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is
1
2
granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order to file an opposition to Defendant
3
Hebron’s motion for summary judgment.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
7
October 11, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?