Perrotte v. Johnson et al

Filing 54

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why Defendants: Stacey Johnson and Jean Leflore should not be dismissed, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/14/2016. Show Cause Response due by 12/8/2016.(Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

JEFFREY P. PERROTTE,

8

Plaintiff,

9
10

v.
STACEY JOHNSON, et al.,

11

Defendants.

12

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-00026-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS
STACEY JOHNSON AND JEAN LEFLORE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
[ECF No. 52]

13
Plaintiff Jeffrey P. Perrotte is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

14
15

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On September 30, 2016, the Court issued an order sending Plaintiff the service of process

16
17

forms for completion and return for service of Defendants Stacey Johnson and Jean LeFlore by the

18

United States Marshal. Over thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has failed to comply and/or respond

19

to the Court’s order. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days from

20

the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause why Defendants Johnson and LeFlore

21

should not be dismissed, without prejudice. Failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of

22

Defendants Johnson and LeFlore.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated:

26

November 14, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1