Escobedo v. Bonk et al
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/30/15 ORDERING that this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Jose Escobedo
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE ESCOBEDO,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
vs.
ROGER F. BONK, et al.,
Defendants.
) No. 1:15-cv-00030-MCE-SMS
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Jose Escobedo and Defendants
2
Roger F. Bonk and Pool Kingdom, Inc., the parties to this action, by and through their
3
respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-
4
captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own
5
attorneys’ fees and costs.
6
Date: June 24, 2015
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
7
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff
Jose Escobedo
8
9
10
Date: June 24, 2015
THE REICH LAW FIRM
11
/s/ Jeff Reich
Jeff Reich
Shane Reich
Attorneys for Defendants,
Roger F. Bonk; Pool Kingdom, Inc.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ORDER
The parties having so stipulated, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be
dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2015
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?