Escobedo v. Bonk et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/30/15 ORDERING that this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff Jose Escobedo 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ESCOBEDO, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs. ROGER F. BONK, et al., Defendants. ) No. 1:15-cv-00030-MCE-SMS ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ) ACTION; ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER Page 1 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Jose Escobedo and Defendants 2 Roger F. Bonk and Pool Kingdom, Inc., the parties to this action, by and through their 3 respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above- 4 captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own 5 attorneys’ fees and costs. 6 Date: June 24, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 7 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff Jose Escobedo 8 9 10 Date: June 24, 2015 THE REICH LAW FIRM 11 /s/ Jeff Reich Jeff Reich Shane Reich Attorneys for Defendants, Roger F. Bonk; Pool Kingdom, Inc. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ORDER The parties having so stipulated, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 30, 2015 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?