McMahon v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
9
ORDER explaining procedure for service by US Marshal Service. The Court hereby DIRECTS Plaintiff to resubmit his completed documents for service to the Clerk of Court as directed in document 5-3. In the alternative, Plaintiff's attorney may elect to serve Defendant himself, as permitted by the order granting Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, document 4 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 3/3/2015. (Rooney, M)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
4
NICKOLAS W. McMAHON,
Plaintiff,
5
6
7
Case No. 1:15-cv-00043-SMS
ORDER EXPLAINING PROCEDURE
FOR SERVICE BY U.S. MARSHAL
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
8
Defendant.
(Doc. 8)
9
10
11
Plaintiff Nickolas W. McMahon has filed the declaration of his attorney, Jared T. Walker,
reporting that the U.S. Marshal refused to service the summons and complaint in this case in
12
compliance with the Instructions for Service of Social Security Appeals (Doc. 5-3) provided by the
13
14
Clerk of Court. Mr. Walker's declaration reports that he forwarded the completed copies of the
15
documents directly to the U.S. Marshal's service rather than returning them to the Clerk of Court as
16
directed by the Instructions. Because of this error, the Court was unable to review the documents
17
and issue its order directing service by the Marshal.
18
19
Accordingly, the Court hereby DIRECTS Plaintiff to resubmit his completed documents for
20
service to the Clerk of Court as directed in Document 5-3. In the alternative, Plaintiff's attorney may
21
elect to serve Defendant himself, as permitted by the order granting Plaintiff's request to proceed in
22
forma pauperis (Doc. 4).
23
24
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 3, 2015
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?