Rodriguez v. Dickenson et al
Filing
12
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should not be Dismissed for Failure to Comply With a Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/22/16. Show Cause Response Due Within Fourteen Days. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LUIS V. RODRIGUEZ,
12
Case No. 1:15-cv-00065-SAB-PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT
ORDER
v.
13
K. DICKENSON, et al.,
14
(ECF NO. 8)
Defendants.
15
FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE
16
Plaintiff Luis V. Rodriguez is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
17
18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction
1
19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
On January 21, 2016, the Court screened and dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint, with leave
20
21 to amend, for failure to state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff was directed to file an
22 amended complaint within thirty days from the date of service. (Id.) Plaintiff failed to file an
23 amended complaint, and on March 4, 2016, an order to show cause was entered, directing
24 Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order
25 and failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 9.) On March 8, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension
26 of time in which to file an amended complaint. On March 11, 2016, an order was entered,
27 discharging the order to show cause, and granting Plaintiff a thirty day extension of time in
28
1
Plaintiff filed a consent to proceed before a magistrate judge on February 10, 2015. (ECF No. 4. )
1
1 which to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.)
The thirty day period has expired, and
2 Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a
3 result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted.
Accordingly, Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days as to why this action
4
5 should not be dismissed. Plaintiff is cautioned that that failure to comply with this order will
6 result in dismissal of this action for failure to comply with a court order and failure to state a
7 cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted.
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11 Dated:
April 22, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?