Vartabedian v. Tulare County Office of Education

Filing 19

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT with Prejudice per 41(A)(1)(A)(ii) and ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/9/15. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2 SHELLEY G. BRYANT - #222925

AMANDA B. WHITTEN - #251160

3 BRYANT WHITTEN, LLP
8050 North Palm Avenue, Suite 210
4 Fresno, California 93711
[phone] Telephone
5 [phone] Facsimile
6
7 Attorney for Plaintiff, NICOLE
VARTABEDIAN
8
9
10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15

NICOLE VARTABEDIAN,

16
17

Plaintiff,
v.

18
19
20
21

Case No. 1:15-cv-00083-SKO
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PER
FRCP 41(A)(1)(A)(ii) AND ORDER
(Doc. 18)

TULARE COUNTY OFFICE OF
EDUCATION,
Defendant.
_____________________________________/

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD:
Plaintiff, NICOLE VARTABEDIAN, by and through her attorneys of record, and
Defendant TULARE COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, by and through its attorneys of
record, hereby stipulate to dismissal of this action with prejudice, each party to bear its own
attorneys’ fees and costs.

1
2

Dated: October 7, 2015

3

BRYANT WHITTEN, LLP

/s/
________________________________________
SHELLEY G. BRYANT, Attorneys for Plaintiff,
NICOLE VARTABEDIAN

4
5
6
7
8 Dated: October _____, 2015
9
10

McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE
& CARRUTH

/s/
____________________________________________
ANTHONY N. DeMARIA, Attorneys for Defendant,
TULARE COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION

11
12
13
14

ORDER

15
16

Based on the parties’ stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

17

1.

The entire matter is DISMISSED, with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(A)(2); and

18
2.

19

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

20
21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23 Dated:

October 9, 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
2