Matthew Powell v. Barron et al

Filing 46

ORDER Denying, with Prejudice, Plaintiff's 43 Motion for Issuance of Subpoena Duces Tecum, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/9/16. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MATTHEW POWELL,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
M. BARRON, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-00089-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
[ECF No. 43]

Plaintiff Matthew Powell is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum, filed
July 21, 2016.
First, Plaintiff is advised that the discovery phase of this action is not yet open. If and when

22

Defendants are served with process and file an answer to the complaint, the Court will issue a

23

discovery and scheduling order opening the discovery phase in this action. Second, the Clerk’s Office

24

will issue Plaintiff a subpoena only upon order of the Court and, in this instance Plaintiff does not

25

indicate whether he is seeking to subpoena records from Defendants or from a non-party. Plaintiff

26

must seek documents from Defendants via a request for the production of documents, not a subpoena

27

duces tecum. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34. Third, the Court will authorize the Clerk’s Office to issue a

28

subpoena duces tecum commanding a third party to produce documents only if (1) Plaintiff is unable
1

1

to obtain the documents directly from Defendants and (2) he thereafter files a motion to compel which

2

results in a determination that he is entitled to the documents but Defendants lack possession, custody,

3

or control over them. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d) (parties have a duty to avoid imposing undue burden

4

or expense on person subject to subpoena and courts are required to enforce this duty) (quotation

5

marks omitted); Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High School Dist., 768 F.3d 843, 862 (9th Cir. 2014)

6

(district courts have “wide discretion in controlling discovery.”) (internal quotation marks and citation

7

omitted). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum is DENIED, without

8

prejudice.

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11

Dated:

12

August 9, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2