International Fruit Genetics, LLC v. R.B. Sandrini, Inc. et al

Filing 26

ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/20/2015. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
INTERNATIONAL FRUIT GENETICS,

16

) Case No.: 1:15-cv-00101 MCE JLT
)
) ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

17

This matter has been set for a settlement conference on December 2, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in

11

Plaintiff,

12
v.

13
14

R.B. SANDRINI, INC. , et al.,
Defendants.

15

18

Courtroom 6 at the Robert E. Coyle Federal Courthouse, located at 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno,

19

California. (Doc. 25) Therefore, the Court ORDERS:

20

1.

21

appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority to

22

negotiate and settle the case on any terms1 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a serious

23

matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the procedures

24

the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference:

Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall

25
26
27
28

1

Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements
are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by
a person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in
the process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible, the representative shall have the
authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party’s most recent
demand.

1

1

a.

At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to

2

Defendant via fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful settlement

3

demand which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate;

4

b.

Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the settlement conference, Defendant

5

SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or with a meaningful2

6

counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate.

7

c.

If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their

8

settlement offers to their Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below.

9

Copies of these documents shall not be filed on the court docket.

10

d.

At least five court days before the Settlement Conference, the parties shall

11

submit, directly to Judge Thurston’s chambers by e-mail to [e-mail], a

12

Confidential Settlement Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the

13

Clerk of the Court nor served on any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of

14

Lodging of Settlement Conference Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked

15

“confidential” with the date and time of the Settlement Conference indicated prominently

16

thereon;

17

e.

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

18

A.

A brief statement of the facts of the case;

19

B.

A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other

20

grounds upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the

21

parties’ likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of

22

the major issues in dispute;

23

C.

A summary of the proceedings to date;

24

D.

An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery,

25
26
27
28

2

“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,
however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should
trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the
settlement conference via stipulation. This obligation will be strictly enforced and a party’s failure to comply will be
grounds for the imposition of sanctions.

2

1

pretrial and trial;

2

E.

The relief sought;

3

F.

The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers

4

and a history of past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 20, 2015

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3