International Fruit Genetics, LLC v. R.B. Sandrini, Inc. et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION and ORDER 28 Continuing Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/16/2015. Settlement Conference CONTINUED to 1/7/2016 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JLT), Fresno, before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BARRY L. GOLDNER, SBN 107126 CHRISTOPHER E. DOMINGUEZ, SBN 193850 KLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER, COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP 4550 California Ave., Second Floor Bakersfield, CA 93309 Telephone: 661-395-1000 Facsimile: 661-326-0418 Email: bgoldner@kleinlaw.com; cdominguez@kleinlaw.com Attorneys for Defendants R.B. SANDRINI, INC., R.B. SANDRINI FARMS, L.P. d/b/a RB SANDRINI FARMS AND RICHARD B. SANDRINI 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 INTERNATIONAL FRUIT GENETICS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 v. R.B. SANDRINI, INC., R.B. SANDRINI FARMS, L.P. D/B/A RB SANDRINI FARMS, AND RICHARD B. SANDRINI, 17 Case No. 1:15-CV-00101-MCE-JLT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (Doc. 28) Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 23 This Stipulation to Continue the Settlement Conference in the above-referenced matter is 24 made and entered into by and between defendants R.B. SANDRINI, INC., R.B. SANDRINI 25 FARMS, L.P. D/B/A RB SANDRINI FARMS, AND RICHARD B. SANDRINI (“SANDRINI”), 26 and plaintiff INTERNATIONAL FRUIT GENETICS, LLC (“IFG”), through their attorneys of 27 record. 28 /// 30 31 15cv101.o.grnt.stip cont MSC.In't Fruit.MCE.JLT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RECITALS 1. WHEREAS, the Settlement Conference in the above-entitled action is currently set for December 3, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6 at the Robert E. Coyle Federal Courthouse. 2. WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants is unavailable on the date currently scheduled for the Settlement Conference. 3. WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to continue the Settlement Conference to a future date. 4. WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred, and have agreed that they will be available to participate in a Settlement Conference during the first three weeks of January 2016, or the last two weeks of February 2016, to be scheduled at the Court’s convenience. 11 STIPULATION 12 1. The current date scheduled for the Settlement Conference shall be vacated; 13 2. A new date for the Settlement Conference will be set for a date during the first 3 14 15 16 17 18 weeks of January 2016, or the last two weeks of February 2016, at the Court’s convenience. 3. All deadlines associated with the Settlement Conference shall be extended to correspond with the new Settlement Conference date set by the Court. IT IS SO STIPULATED, through counsel of record. Dated: November 11, 2015 KLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP 19 By: 20 21 22 23 Dated: November 11, 2015 24 /s/ Barry L. Goldner BARRY L. GOLDNER Attorneys for Defendants R.B. SANDRINI, INC., R.B. SANDRINI FARMS, L.P. d/b/a RB SANDRINI FARMS AND RICHARD B. SANDRINI CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS LLP By: 25 26 /s/ Richard C. O’Hare RICHARD C. O’HARE JOHN B. DAWSON Attorneys for Plaintiff INTERNATIONAL FRUIT GENETICS, LLC 27 28 30 31 2 15cv101.o.grnt.stip cont MSC.In't Fruit.MCE.JLT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 1 ORDER 2 Based upon the stipulation of counsel, the Court ORDERS: 3 1. 4 5 6 The Settlement Conference for this Action is continued to January 7, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6 at the Robert E. Coyle Courthouse in Fresno, California; 2. The Order re Settlement Conference (Doc. 26) applies to the continued settlement conference and the parties SHALL comply with it. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 16, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 31 3 15cv101.o.grnt.stip cont MSC.In't Fruit.MCE.JLT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?